The story of bread is also the story of life. Quite literally. Every human culture to exist since we, as a
species, began to (even unconsciously, at first) cultivate agriculture, has had
a bread, their bread. Humans swapped an
always-on-the-go, nomadic existence for a living structure that closely
resembles today’s, but with less density.
This is an important footnote for bread: since its introduction into human society, we
began to live in bigger and bigger groups, which, at a certain point on our
timeline, began interacting and affecting with each other, until the saturation
point we have reached now: true global
reach. This produces a greater diversity
and accumulation of just about everything imaginable, from shared knowledge to
bad memes featuring LOLZ cats.
What does bread have to do with this? Everything, and nothing. It touches upon more aspects of human life,
of both our being and being in general, and even toggles up a meta-level or two
on the ontological scale, with implications reaching into the nature of our
universe.
It is also something we, as a species, like to eat,
digest and then defecate. Why do I say
this? Because, well, it’s true: bread sustains life, and in more ways than
one. What is life, after all, if not
just a collected series of eating, shitting and fucking with (hopefully) some
genetic replication thrown in, and with the final result of death? That last, ultimate consequence be damned, we
and every other species endeavours on.
Why?
That’s the definition of life, really, an organic
substance with intentions of carrying itself forward, somehow, from its current
state of being and into another. The
very opposite of entropy. Matter
organising and copying itself from one energy state and into another, only for
no other reason than to continue along the same path.
Bread, like mentioned before, is the story of
life. A brief investigation into its
origins will show that it increases the life activity of every organism
involved in its production.
How? Simple:
Lactic-acid bacteria want to live (maximise genetic
replication).
Yeast want to live.
Tall grasses want to live.
Humans like to eat and get drunk. They also want to live, too.
There are other, outlier species in this story, too,
like insects, rodents, birds and the like, all with similar intentions. So, all these species, bound by the one
common goal, interact with each other, and, over time, unwittingly work
together to find a solution that maximises the expression of life activity
(metabolic and reproductive) for all those involved. The solution reached occurs because, as each
species is reproducing itself (carrying copies of itself forward, into a new
energy state), errors occur in the copying process that result in slight
variations. At times the differences
benefit the one, shared goal, to try to maximise the life activity of all those
involved, and, when it does, those copies tend to be carried further more often
because they simply work. The funny
thing about all this is that each species lives it life separately, unaware of
the other, and yet each of their life choices influences each other individual
species as well as the group as a whole.
These interactions (co-evolutions) arrive at a very clever solution to
the question asked, how to maximise the life potential of all those involved.
The answer?
Bread, of course.
It maximises both the metabolic and reproductive
activity of all the players in this game, which is, as I said before, the story
of life.
Quite literally.
And the end result?
A loaf of bread, an edible collection of organic
matter, arranged to carry life forward.
This is what we get when we crush the seeds or grains
of local tall-grasses and then mix the result with water, forming a paste that
can be transformed into physically-preserved evidence that organic matter
defied, however briefly, the universe’s overarching mandate of eventual
degradation.
This blog will explore the in’s and out’s of bread, about
what it means to bake and break bread.
Hi Ars.
ReplyDeletei have followed you here from TFL.
i am very interested in what you have to say. freedom of speech is so special it needs preserving. cant wait to see how your thread develops.
John.
The Baking Bear
Nice write up to answer "bread...why?" I like the parallels and differences between your take and Peter Reinhart's.
ReplyDelete